Hospital Docente Clínico-Quirúrgico Dr. Miguel Enríquez, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Miguel Enríquez, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba
Hospital Docente Clínico-Quirúrgico Dr. Miguel Enríquez, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Miguel Enríquez, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba
Hospital Docente Clínico-Quirúrgico Dr. Miguel Enríquez, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Miguel Enríquez, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba
Hospital Docente Clínico-Quirúrgico Dr. Miguel Enríquez, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Miguel Enríquez, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Miguel Enríquez, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba
Introduction: Breast cancer is a health problem with great impact nationally and internationally. It constitutes a challenge for the medical personnel who face it, requiring a multidisciplinary approach due to its complexity.
Aim: To describe the results of the application of the AELI® KINETEST protocol in patients with breast cancer.
Methods: A technological innovation, descriptive, longitudinal, cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out using a qualitative methodology in the Bioenergetic Medicine Clinic of the Miguel Enriquez Hospital. The sample constituted by the 24 patients presenting said disease proven by biopsy in the period from January to December 2017.
Results: Breast cancer predominates more in the female sex in 95,8 %. There was correspondence between emotional conflict, biological laterality and anatomical location.
Conclusions: The use of the muscle test of the AELI® KINETEST protocol complemented the diagnosis of the emotional conflictual situation.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.